{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"EC News - Area fiscale","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.ecnews.it\/fiscale","author_name":"sviluppo@aethic.ai","author_url":"https:\/\/www.ecnews.it\/fiscale\/author\/sviluppoaethic-ai\/","title":"Transfer pricing domestico - EC News - Area fiscale","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Cq8Jh2Plv1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecnews.it\/fiscale\/accertamento-e-contenzioso\/accertamento\/transfer-pricing-domestico\/\">Transfer pricing domestico<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ecnews.it\/fiscale\/accertamento-e-contenzioso\/accertamento\/transfer-pricing-domestico\/embed\/#?secret=Cq8Jh2Plv1\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Transfer pricing domestico&#8221; &#8212; EC News - Area fiscale\" data-secret=\"Cq8Jh2Plv1\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.ecnews.it\/app\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/01\/giudice-61.jpg","thumbnail_width":405,"thumbnail_height":227,"description":"Con la sentenza n. 12844 del 22 giugno 2015, i Giudici della Suprema Corte hanno avuto modo di ribadire il proprio convincimento sul fenomeno del c.d. transfer pricing \u201cdomestico\u201d gi\u00e0 chiarito con talune passate pronunce (v. sentenza n. 7716 del 27 marzo 2013, sentenza n. 17955 del 24 luglio 2013, sentenza n. 8849 del 16&#8230;"}